I don't start with AI.
I start with the bottleneck.
Then I choose the architecture.
Business users waited hours for portfolio insights. Underwriters spent nearly an hour processing bureau reports. Operations teams manually merged reports every day. Those weren't AI problems. They were information bottlenecks. I build systems that remove them.
Working in lending taught me that businesses rarely suffer from a lack of data. They suffer because useful information reaches decision makers too slowly. Most of what I build exists to remove that delay.
B.Tech graduate from MNNIT Allahabad (2025, CGPA 8.02), working in Portfolio Analytics and Applied AI at Shriram Finance Limited, covering 147+ branches and 16 regions across India.
I observe workflows, find the recurring friction, and build reliable systems to eliminate it. Sometimes the right answer is Python automation. Sometimes SQL. Sometimes OCR. Sometimes AI. Sometimes a hybrid.
Technology follows the problem.
Not the other way around.
In lending, incorrect numbers matter more than slow numbers. That is why I keep business calculations deterministic and use AI only for reasoning and interpretation, never for the numbers themselves.
Next iteration of the query and reporting pipeline.
Advanced RAG for grounded borrower Q&A.
Evaluation frameworks and reliability patterns for production agents.
Extending automation across collections and underwriting workflows.
If you are solving a difficult operational problem and wondering whether AI is actually the right answer, I would love to talk.